Web apps & APIs
Run Next.js, Django, Rails, Laravel, anything you'd put on a droplet. Full root, NVMe, dedicated IP. Identical workflow, independent provider.
Pick a country to see Cloudzy in your language.
DigitalOcean Alternative
AMD EPYC + NVMe + 40 Gbps · 12 global regions · plans from $2.48/mo.
Independent since 2008, never acquired, never VC-funded.
Starting at $2.48/mo · 50% off · 14-day money-back · No credit card required
Cloudzy vs DigitalOcean at a glance
Cloudzy is an independent cloud-VPS provider operating since 2008 from 13 regions across North America, Europe, the Middle East, and Asia. Plans start at $2.48/mo on AMD EPYC with DDR5, pure NVMe storage and 40 Gbps uplinks, alongside a dedicated IPv4, 60-second provisioning, and a 14-day money-back guarantee. Compared to DigitalOcean, a publicly-traded cloud platform. Cloudzy answers to builders, not shareholders, and is rated 4.7 / 5 by 766+ reviewers on Trustpilot.
Why builders pick Cloudzy
Four reasons builders move from DigitalOcean to Cloudzy.
17 years building the same product. Never acquired. Never VC-owned. Roadmap set by what builders need, not by quarterly earnings.
Try Cloudzy for two weeks. Don't like it? Full refund, no questions asked. Crypto, PayPal, or card, your call.
Live status at status.cloudzy.com. We publish last-30-day numbers, not aggregate yearly averages that hide outages.
Live chat replies typically under 5 minutes. Engineers, not script-readers. Available 24/7 in every plan tier.
Side-by-side
We won't trash-talk DigitalOcean, they're a real platform. But here's where Cloudzy makes a different choice.
Comparisons are qualitative, for current pricing and SLAs always check both providers' live pricing pages.
Benchmarks
We ran standardized tests on production Cloudzy hardware and cross-referenced against DigitalOcean's published results on vpsbenchmarks.com. Same benchmark tool, Geekbench 6, used by both sides. This is a direct comparison, not an estimate.
| Cloudzy | DigitalOcean | |
|---|---|---|
| Plan | Dedicated VPS · 2 vCPU · 2 GB DDR5 | Premium Intel 2 vCPU / 4 GB |
| Monthly price | $14.47 | $24.00 |
| GB6 single-core | 1,079 | 808 – 965 (range across published runs) |
| GB6 multi-core | 1,886 | 1,392 – 1,677 (range across published runs) |
| Core type | Dedicated AMD EPYC | Shared vCPU |
| Test basis | Median of 20 production runs | Multiple published runs (vpsbenchmarks.com) |
DigitalOcean's published Geekbench 6 results vary significantly across runs on their own infrastructure. Single-core scores range from 808 to 965, multi-core from 1,392 to 1,677. That spread isn't noise. It reflects the real-world variability of shared CPU pools, where your performance depends on what your neighbors are doing at any given moment. Cloudzy exceeds even the best DO single-core result (965) by 114 points, on hardware that doesn't share CPU time with anyone.
DigitalOcean's Premium Intel plans run on shared vCPUs. Your cores come from a physical core pool split across multiple tenants. When the pool is busy, your cores get less. When a reviewer benchmarks on a quiet instance, the pool isn't busy. The score variation across DigitalOcean's own published runs, 157 points on single-core alone, is that effect in action.
The technical proof is CPU steal time, the fraction of your scheduled CPU cycles the hypervisor quietly reassigns to another VM without your workload knowing.
Cloudzy CPU steal time
Measured across 20 consecutive production runs under sustained load. Zero every time. A zero steal reading means the dedicated core guarantee is real, not aspirational, every scheduled cycle reaches your workload.
Sysbench multi-core scaling ratio
Multi-core throughput divided by single-core, against a theoretical maximum of 2.00× for two fully independent cores. On an overcommitted shared CPU pool this ratio drops, physical cores contend for time. 1.93× means they don't, the cores are genuinely isolated.
vpsbenchmarks.com doesn't run these tests. We do, and we publish them.
| Metric | Result | CV | What it measures |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sysbench integer throughput · single-core | 1,010.5 EPS | 0.5% | Raw per-core compute under sustained prime-number load |
| Sysbench integer throughput · multi-core | 1,961.1 EPS | 1.4% | Aggregate compute, both cores simultaneously |
| Sysbench scaling ratio | 1.93× | 1.3% | Core isolation proof, 1.93 of a possible 2.00 |
| UnixBench · single-process | 725.9 | 2.0% | Composite: arithmetic, I/O, pipe throughput, system calls |
| UnixBench · multi-process | 1,506.5 | 2.7% | Full workload suite, all cores |
| CPython 3.12 full source compile | 124 s | 2.2% | Build Python from scratch, 400 C files, 2+ min of real sustained load |
| DDR5 memory read bandwidth | 81,648 MB/s | 2.0% | What your application actually reads from RAM, not the spec-sheet ceiling |
CV = coefficient of variation (stddev ÷ median × 100). Below 5% means the number is stable run to run, this is the floor, not a peak.
| Cloudzy | DO Premium Intel | DO Basic / Regular | DO CPU-Optimized | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Monthly price | $14.47 | $24.00 | $24.00 | $42.00 |
| RAM | 2 GB | 4 GB | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| CPU type | Dedicated | Shared | Shared | Dedicated |
| GB6 single-core (best published) | 1,079 | 965 | 884 | 1,124 |
| GB6 pts per dollar (single) | 74.57 | 40.21 | 36.83 | 26.76 |
| GB6 multi-core (best published) | 1,886 | 1,677 | 1,518 | 1,337 |
| GB6 pts per dollar (multi) | 130.34 | 69.88 | 63.25 | 31.83 |
Want dedicated cores from DigitalOcean? That's the CPU-Optimized plan at $42/month, the most expensive option in this comparison. Its best published single-core score, 1,124, does edge out Cloudzy's 1,079 by about 4%. But at $42/month it costs 66% more, and its performance-per-dollar ratio, 26.76 points per dollar, is the lowest of any plan shown here. Cloudzy, at $14.47/month, achieves 74.57 points per dollar, the highest ratio in the table by a wide margin.
Cloudzy's figures are medians from 20 consecutive runs on live production infrastructure, the same machines billing customers between test windows, not provisioned showcase instances. Every CPU metric carries a coefficient of variation below 3%. These aren't peaks. They're baselines.
DigitalOcean's Geekbench 6 results come from multiple published runs on vpsbenchmarks.com. Those runs show meaningful variance, up to 19% spread on single-core within the same plan tier. A single run is not a baseline. It's a moment in time. A range of runs reveals what the hardware actually delivers across varying load conditions.
Use cases
Run Next.js, Django, Rails, Laravel, anything you'd put on a droplet. Full root, NVMe, dedicated IP. Identical workflow, independent provider.
WireGuard, OpenVPN, or Outline in 5 minutes. Static dedicated IP. No big-cloud telemetry, no shareholder pressure on your traffic data.
Hourly billing means a 4 GB staging box costs pennies for a CI run. Spin up, test, tear down. Same UX as droplets, predictable monthly bill.
Pre-installed Docker, ready for k3s, microk8s, or your own k8s. Run game servers, databases, your own platform, no managed-cluster lock-in.
Trading bots, scraping workers, queue runners. Sub-millisecond broker latency on the right region. No cold starts, no surprise egress bills.
Pre-baked CUDA images on every GPU plan. Serve LLMs, run vLLM/TGI, host your model behind your own API, without big-cloud lock-in.
Global network
Drop your VPS as close to your users as physics allows. Median P50 latency under 10 ms in North America and Europe.
Pricing
Hourly, monthly, or yearly. No egress fees. No commitments. Currently 50% off all plans.
Sandbox · Personal projects
Small sites · Side projects
Busy WordPress · APIs
Production · AI inference
FAQ. Cloudzy vs DigitalOcean
Try Cloudzy for two weeks. If we're not the DigitalOcean alternative you wanted, we refund the full amount, no questions.
No credit card required · 14-day money-back guarantee · Cancel anytime